The Incident
A supervisor contacts the Human Resources Office because one of his employees is making the other employees in the office uncomfortable. He said the employee does not seem to have engaged in any actionable misconduct but, because of the employer’s new workplace violence policy, and the workplace violence training he had just received, he thought he should at least mention what was going on. The employee was recently divorced and had been going through a difficult time for over two years and had made it clear that he was having financial problems which were causing him to be stressed out. He was irritable and aggressive in his speech much of the time. He would routinely talk about the number of guns he owned, not in the same sentence, but in the same general conversation in which he would mention that someone else was causing all of his problems.
Incident Response
At the first meeting with the supervisor, the Human Resources Supervisor
and Employee Assistance Program (EAP) counselor suggested that, since
this was a long-running situation rather than an immediate crisis, the
supervisor would have time to do some fact-finding. They gave him
several suggestions on how to do this while safeguarding the privacy of
the employee (for example, request a confidential conversation with
previous supervisors, go back for more information from coworkers who
had registered complaints, and, if he was not already familiar with the
employee’s personnel records, pull his file to see if there are any previous
adverse actions in it). Two days later they had another meeting to discuss
the case and strategize a plan of action.
The supervisor’s initial fact-finding showed that the employee’s coworkers
attributed his aggressive behavior to the difficult divorce situation he had
been going through, but they were nevertheless afraid of him. The supervisor did not learn any more specifics about why they were afraid, except
that he was short-tempered, ill-mannered, and spoke a lot about his guns
(although, according to the coworkers, in a matter-of-fact rather than in
an intimidating manner).
After getting ideas from the Human Resources Supervisor and the EAP
counselor, the supervisor sat down with the employee and discussed his
behavior. He told the employee it was making everyone uncomfortable
and that it must stop. He referred the employee to the EAP, setting a time
and date to meet with the counselor.
Resolution
As a result of counseling by the supervisor and by the Employee Assistance Program counselor, the employee changed his behavior. He was
unaware that his behavior had been scaring people. He learned new
ways from the EAP to deal with people. He accepted the EAP referral to a
therapist in the community to address underlying personal problems.
Continued monitoring by the supervisor showed the employee’s conduct
improving to an acceptable level and remaining that way.
Questions for Discussion
- Do you agree with the approach in this case?
- Can you think of other situations that would lend themselves to this kind of low-key approach?
- Does your organization have effective EAP training so that supervisors are comfortable in turning to the EAP for advice?
More......
- Case Study - “Stalking”
- Case Study - “Drug and Alcohol Problem”
- Case Study - “A Threat”
- Case Study - “Threat from a Termination”
- Case Study - “Harassing Behavior”
- Case Study - “Psychological Problem”
- Case Study - “Gun Threat”
- Case Study - “Sexual Assault”
- Case Study - “Horseplay or Fighting?”
- Case Study - “Temporary Restraining Order”
- Case Study - “Disruptive Behavior”
- Case Study - “Behavioral Problem”
- Case Study - “Random Vandalism or Retaliation?”